Parental
Abductions -- Foreign & Domestic
If you believe your child has
been abducted, the first thing you need to do is call the Police! Your
local law enforcement officials have the power and authority to put into action
all manner of means and resources to initiate a search for your child. Parental
abductions are very different from "kidnapping". By definition,
a kidnapper is one who wrongfully takes a child to whom he/she has no custodial
claim. Unless
there is a court order in existence to the contrary, Kentucky law presumes that
both parents have equal authority to make decisions in the best interest of the
child. This means that,
assuming there is no court order to the contrary, both parents have the decision-making
power to decide where the child will live, go to school, attend worship
services, receive medical attention, etc. "Custody" is actually
this decision-making authority, not so much with whom the child might be at any
given point in time. But,
if one parent unilaterally decides on his or her own that the child is not going
to live in its "customary domicile" or usual place of residence, the
other parent has the right to object to this one-sided decision. The usual
recourse is to approach the Court in the county where the child has historically
lived to settle this dispute. When
one parent keeps a child from the other parent, that is considered parental
abduction or custodial interference. In
the event of parental abduction or custodial interference here in Kentucky, we
recommend you consult with an experienced Family Law Attorney in your area to
file an action on your behalf in the local court, such as the Jefferson Family
Court. If, however,
your child has been taken by the other parent or someone else either to another
country or from another country into the United States, then you need to consult
with an attorney who is experienced in coordinating recovery and legal efforts
across international lines under the Hague Convention on the Civil
Aspects of International Child Abduction (commonly referred to as the
"Hague Convention"). In addition, it is
critical that you immediately make contact with the U.S.
State Department Office of Children's Issues to enlist their possible
assistance in cases involving international parental abduction, particularly
under the Hague
Convention. This multilateral treaty that seeks to protect children
from the harmful effects of abduction and retention across international
boundaries by providing a procedure to bring about their prompt return. The
United States of America is a party to the Hague Convention and has agreed to be
subject to its rules in international parental abduction matters. To
determine whether the other country involved is also a signatory to the Hague
Convention, see http://hcch.e-vision.nl. In
international abduction cases, a Hague Convention application may be necessary
if a child is taken to or retained in another country, away from his or her
habitual residence, without the consent of a parent who has rights of custody. The
bottom line, under the rules of the Convention, is the abducted or retained
child must be promptly returned to his/her habitual residence unless the return
will create a grave risk of harm to the child. Obviously,
there are no guarantees in such situations, but the Hague Convention sets out a
very complex means of potentially recovering a child so the courts in the
child's habitual place of residence can sort out what is in his/her best
interest. There are currently more than 80
countries which are either members of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction, are signatories to the Convention or have
ratified the Convention. Those nations include: Albania, Argentina,
Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bosnia/Herzegovina, Brazil,
Burkina Faso,
Canada, Chile, only Hong Kong and Macau in China, Columbia, Costa Rica, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia (former USSR), Germany, Greece, Guatemala,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel,
Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of Macedonia, Malta,
Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama,
Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, St. Kitts and Nevis, San Marino,
Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom (Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Bermuda, Cayman Islands,
Falkland Islands, Isle of Man and Montserrat), United States of America,
Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
To confirm whether a country is today a party or
signatory to the Hague Convention, see http://hcch.e-vision.nl.
The Hague Convention is not applicable if a
child is taken to or from a country that is not a party to the accord.
Countries NOT signatory to the
Hague Convention in 2008 included Armenia, Bolivia, most of the
People's Republic of China, Fiji, Honduras, India, Korea (North and South), Republic of Moldova, Nicaragua, Seychelles,
Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan, Vietnam, and most North African, Middle Eastern, Arabic or Muslim nations such
as Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Iran,
Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestine,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates
["UAE"], Western Sahara, Yemen, and others.
The list of countries which comply with the Hague
Convention is constantly changing. For instance, Japan just signed it in
May 2008. Do not rely on the above list as absolute confirmation of a
country's compliance or non-compliance with the Convention. Please confirm
this through other sources, such as the U.S. State Department's website at http://travel.state.gov
or http://hcch.e-vision.nl. U.S. State Department's map of Hague and Non-Hague Countries:
|